Documents / Document

Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, Volume 1 (scan)

NASA via ibiblio · 1969-07-31 · 251 pages · text by OCR

This is Volume 1 of NASA's Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, dated July 31, 1969. The Mission Operations Branch of the Flight Crew Support Division at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston prepared it, and it was originally classified Confidential. In it Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins go phase by phase through suiting, launch, powered flight, Earth orbit and lunar surface activities. They comment on suit fit, vibration, checklists, lunar dust, footing and poor sleeping conditions in the lunar module. A section titled Visual Sightings appears in the table of contents.

  • p. 6 …completing the countdown procedures, the number 2 rotation hand controller was raised to the launch position…
  • p. 9 …They had rotated this handle on the X strut on the left of my seat so…
  • p. 73 …You do have to think about whether the vehicle is rotating or not, in what area…
  • p. 114 …Then it rotated around, and I never really could check the fourth downlock. I was relatively…
  • p. 213 …the LM that the weight of the flag had rotated the entire unit about the ## CONFIDENTIAL
  • p. 220 …The handle deployed upward and rotated around, even though I wasn't able to see it…
  • p. 221 …I would try to push it down to get it to rotate around and it would…
  • p. 225 …On rotating it up to the inverted position to keep anything from coming out, I didn…
  • p. 232 …I ran into a minor problem in getting it to rotate fully so that I could…
  • p. 233 …seem to rotate it as much as I thought it should have been rotated. However, the…
  • p. 237 …it would have amounted to a considerable rotating of the spiral and cursive reticle field back…
## CONFIDENTIAL

ARMSTRONG	There was one observation here that seemed to me to be different from the simulator. In the spacecraft, I could seldom if ever detect a difference in signal strength between MEDIUM and NARROW. In the simulator, it's always decidedly different. The conclusion to be reached is that either the simulator is not an accurate representation of signal strength or that we really weren't getting any difference between MEDIUM and NARROW beam. We were, in fact, stuck in one or the other irrespective of switching.
ALDRIN	I would expect there wasn't as much difference between WIDE and MEDIUM, but when you went to the NARROW, you could see it. It wasn't consistent. In any case, it was unlike what we were used to and as long as the signal was received, I guess it's not a problem.
COLLINS	I think that's a function of distance, too. Now in lunar orbit, there was a noticeable difference between MEDIUM and NARROW. But there were some funnies in that high gain antenna. We were playing with it some time and we didn't have control over it and the ground had one of the OMNI's selected. We thought we were controlling it and we

## CONFIDENTIAL

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 251 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.