Documents / Document
Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, Volume 1 (scan)
NASA via ibiblio · 1969-07-31 · 251 pages · text by OCR
This is Volume 1 of NASA's Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, dated July 31, 1969. The Mission Operations Branch of the Flight Crew Support Division at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston prepared it, and it was originally classified Confidential. In it Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins go phase by phase through suiting, launch, powered flight, Earth orbit and lunar surface activities. They comment on suit fit, vibration, checklists, lunar dust, footing and poor sleeping conditions in the lunar module. A section titled Visual Sightings appears in the table of contents.
“Reading”19 pages
- p. 30 …It was impossible to read an effect on any indicator in the cockpit.
COLLINS This is…
- p. 38 …the expected altitude was 174 and we read 176. The EMS was 3.3 plus.
ARMSTRONG…
- p. 39 …There's no way that the EMS could read 99.1 at docking.
As I recall…
- p. 40 ## CONFIDENTIAL
Then I thrusted minus X until the DELTA-V counter read minus 100.5. I…
- p. 46 …Neil and I both read a memo put out by MPAD, saying that for some failure…
- p. 50 …We gave daily dosimeter readings, which as far as I'm concerned fall in a sort…
- p. 51 …COLLINS And the dosimeter we just gave them a once-a-day reading on that dosimeter…
- p. 68 …When you read me the numbers, you didn't note that I read star number 2…
- p. 79 …The cabin temperature (translunar) was slightly warmer than we would like it, although the gage readings…
- p. 130 …We had good helium pressure and read that out to MSFN. We went through the RCS…
- p. 132 …the AGS, and give you an erroneous reading so you wouldn't pass. In any case…
- p. 134 …There is a bad amount of data that the ground reads up to you in that…
- p. 151 …They did approach the maximum numbers with a reading of approximately 94. Anyway, they weren't…
- p. 169 …with time as evidenced by successive LPD readings.
FCOD REP. Do you recall when you proceeded…
- p. 170 …again, although at the time we were reading relatively low tank pressures. I think the OX…
- p. 172 …We read the sine and cosine out of AGS (and I'm sure they copied that…
- p. 175 …we were going to launch, so we read through the remainder of the simulated countdown and…
- p. 235 …same exercises such as pressure-integrity check, reading the cabin down, and configuring the ECS. I…
- p. 236 …We used a sequence of marking that involved an onboard averaging of five successive cursive readings…
## CONFIDENTIAL
ALDRIN (CONT'D) that by a couple of seconds. The expected $ V_{I} $ was 35575 and I reported 35579; the H-dot expected was 4285 and I have 4321; and, of course, H-dot was building fairly rapidly and that's not quite a mile a second, so the expected altitude was 174 and we read 176. The EMS was 3.3 plus.
ARMSTRONG Yes, we knew, when the EMS showed only 3 ft/sec off in a 10 000-ft/sec burn, it was going to be pretty good to us.
5. 3 UNSTOWAGE AND PREPARATION OF CAMERAS ARMSTRONG No problem.
5. 4 S-IVB MANEUVER TO SEPARATION ATTITUDE
ALDRIN It was right on schedule and no comment.
5. 5 PRESEPARATION CONFIGURATION
ALDRIN No problems.
5. 6 MCC GO/NO GO FOR PYRO ARM
ALDRIN Well how about that high $ \mathrm{O}_{2} $ flow anomaly that I think the ground picked up?
ARMSTRONG Yes, I guess that's right.
5. 9 S-IVB/IU CONTROL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ARMSTRONG Good.
## CONFIDENTIAL About this file
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 251 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.