Documents / Document

Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, Volume 1 (scan)

NASA via ibiblio · 1969-07-31 · 251 pages · text by OCR

This is Volume 1 of NASA's Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, dated July 31, 1969. The Mission Operations Branch of the Flight Crew Support Division at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston prepared it, and it was originally classified Confidential. In it Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins go phase by phase through suiting, launch, powered flight, Earth orbit and lunar surface activities. They comment on suit fit, vibration, checklists, lunar dust, footing and poor sleeping conditions in the lunar module. A section titled Visual Sightings appears in the table of contents.

  • p. 22 …COLLINS The only interference I noted was that Neil's suit pocket interfered with the abort…
  • p. 31 …You hand them up and you get the bracket from Neil. It's really sort of…
  • p. 46 …DAP control 5 seconds after spring actuations. Neil and I both read a memo put out…
  • p. 121 …I think that Neil came in just about on schedule. I was able to accomplish three…
  • p. 148 …The way that we found to work out best was for Neil to tell me when…
  • p. 149 ## CONFIDENTIAL soon as Neil would say "MARK", I'd hit ENTER, record NOUN 20. Now the…
  • p. 176 ## CONFIDENTIAL with the EVA and it was sometime in here that Neil called to ground and…
  • p. 185 …The problem was not with mine, but in hooking up Neil's. I can't say…
  • p. 187 …So we unstowed Neil's, and that didn't help immediately. A little later, it seemed…
  • p. 191 …my feet and posterior out the hatch, Neil was in good position, as good as I…
  • p. 196 …In confirmation of Neil's findings, I didn't experience any hot or even warm spots…
  • p. 209 …amount of traverse of this kind. ## ALDRIN Neil initially pulled out about 20 feet of cable…
  • p. 222 …BB was still sitting on the edge. Neil came by with the camera to photograph it…
  • p. 223 …While I proceeded to that — because that's essentially a one-man operation — Neil went around…
  • p. 229 …doubt is a pretty good step, though Neil tells me he got up to the third…
  • p. 231 ## CONFIDENTIAL I had very little difficulty, again using the same technique that Neil used. About half…
  • p. 236 …and then five successive spiral readings that Neil would log down as I would read them…
  • p. 241 …I guess it slipped my mind, perhaps Neil's too, that the Apollo 10 crew had…
  • p. 251 …It was a question of my looking at the LEC, talking to Neil, and hoping we…
# CONFIDENTIAL

the ground for the zenith passage. So I was fully expecting it to acquire again. I don't think we had our AGS configured and the ground was not as helpful as they might have been had we run this sort of thing previously in simulations and had a bit more training on it.

We started to do the P57 and realized that this would be too soon before lift-off. It seems to me we had a time period in which we were essentially standing by. We did an abbreviated RCS check. Because one of them was a coldfire check, we got all the red flags coming on. We did an AGS calibration, got the ascent pad; then, at about 45 or 50 minutes before lift-off, we called up the P57 again.

We did a landing site option at the TIG of lift-off. The torquing angles between this alignment and the previous one were on the order of 0.09 degree maximum. The gravity alignment had an initial error of 0.00001 and on recycle had the same thing. I don't have logged down what the star-angle difference was, but it was - probably on the order of 7 to 9, somewhere in there. It wasn't anything that made me jump up and down. But again it was measuring the difference between gravity and a star and, of course, doesn't really indicate how well you know the star position

## CONFIDENTIAL

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 251 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.