Documents / Document

Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, Volume 1 (scan)

NASA via ibiblio · 1969-07-31 · 251 pages · text by OCR

This is Volume 1 of NASA's Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, dated July 31, 1969. The Mission Operations Branch of the Flight Crew Support Division at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston prepared it, and it was originally classified Confidential. In it Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins go phase by phase through suiting, launch, powered flight, Earth orbit and lunar surface activities. They comment on suit fit, vibration, checklists, lunar dust, footing and poor sleeping conditions in the lunar module. A section titled Visual Sightings appears in the table of contents.

  • p. 22 …COLLINS The only interference I noted was that Neil's suit pocket interfered with the abort…
  • p. 31 …You hand them up and you get the bracket from Neil. It's really sort of…
  • p. 46 …DAP control 5 seconds after spring actuations. Neil and I both read a memo put out…
  • p. 121 …I think that Neil came in just about on schedule. I was able to accomplish three…
  • p. 148 …The way that we found to work out best was for Neil to tell me when…
  • p. 149 ## CONFIDENTIAL soon as Neil would say "MARK", I'd hit ENTER, record NOUN 20. Now the…
  • p. 176 ## CONFIDENTIAL with the EVA and it was sometime in here that Neil called to ground and…
  • p. 185 …The problem was not with mine, but in hooking up Neil's. I can't say…
  • p. 187 …So we unstowed Neil's, and that didn't help immediately. A little later, it seemed…
  • p. 191 …my feet and posterior out the hatch, Neil was in good position, as good as I…
  • p. 196 …In confirmation of Neil's findings, I didn't experience any hot or even warm spots…
  • p. 209 …amount of traverse of this kind. ## ALDRIN Neil initially pulled out about 20 feet of cable…
  • p. 222 …BB was still sitting on the edge. Neil came by with the camera to photograph it…
  • p. 223 …While I proceeded to that — because that's essentially a one-man operation — Neil went around…
  • p. 229 …doubt is a pretty good step, though Neil tells me he got up to the third…
  • p. 231 ## CONFIDENTIAL I had very little difficulty, again using the same technique that Neil used. About half…
  • p. 236 …and then five successive spiral readings that Neil would log down as I would read them…
  • p. 241 …I guess it slipped my mind, perhaps Neil's too, that the Apollo 10 crew had…
  • p. 251 …It was a question of my looking at the LEC, talking to Neil, and hoping we…
# CONFIDENTIAL

average these up and we would put them in. We'd use either spiral or cursive first, whichever appeared to be convenient.

I think this averaging technique worked out better than letting the computer do it, because it would have amounted to a considerable rotating of the spiral and cursive reticle field back and forth to make one spiral, then a cursive, then a spiral, and do a recycle. There is the option, however, to do one or the other. This was a REFSMMAT alignment. The torquing angles were fairly large, the star-angle difference was 00007 which preflight was the expected value of a two-star alignment. Torquing angles were very close to 0.7 in all three axes, which indicated that the platform did drift a fair amount during that time period. We then did the P22. I had hoped at that point to use the AGS to tell me where the command module was, but unfortunately we didn't update the AGS with the latest PGNS state vector so it wasn't giving us good range and range rate. I would recommend doing that, if anyone does a P22 in the future, because you can't use the PGNS to tell you what the range and range rate are. And you can't use the radar because it's not going to lock on until it gets to 400 miles. But the AGS gives

## CONFIDENTIAL

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 251 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.