Documents / Document

Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, Volume 1 (scan)

NASA via ibiblio · 1969-07-31 · 251 pages · text by OCR

This is Volume 1 of NASA's Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, dated July 31, 1969. The Mission Operations Branch of the Flight Crew Support Division at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston prepared it, and it was originally classified Confidential. In it Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins go phase by phase through suiting, launch, powered flight, Earth orbit and lunar surface activities. They comment on suit fit, vibration, checklists, lunar dust, footing and poor sleeping conditions in the lunar module. A section titled Visual Sightings appears in the table of contents.

  • p. 22 …COLLINS The only interference I noted was that Neil's suit pocket interfered with the abort…
  • p. 31 …You hand them up and you get the bracket from Neil. It's really sort of…
  • p. 46 …DAP control 5 seconds after spring actuations. Neil and I both read a memo put out…
  • p. 121 …I think that Neil came in just about on schedule. I was able to accomplish three…
  • p. 148 …The way that we found to work out best was for Neil to tell me when…
  • p. 149 ## CONFIDENTIAL soon as Neil would say "MARK", I'd hit ENTER, record NOUN 20. Now the…
  • p. 176 ## CONFIDENTIAL with the EVA and it was sometime in here that Neil called to ground and…
  • p. 185 …The problem was not with mine, but in hooking up Neil's. I can't say…
  • p. 187 …So we unstowed Neil's, and that didn't help immediately. A little later, it seemed…
  • p. 191 …my feet and posterior out the hatch, Neil was in good position, as good as I…
  • p. 196 …In confirmation of Neil's findings, I didn't experience any hot or even warm spots…
  • p. 209 …amount of traverse of this kind. ## ALDRIN Neil initially pulled out about 20 feet of cable…
  • p. 222 …BB was still sitting on the edge. Neil came by with the camera to photograph it…
  • p. 223 …While I proceeded to that — because that's essentially a one-man operation — Neil went around…
  • p. 229 …doubt is a pretty good step, though Neil tells me he got up to the third…
  • p. 231 ## CONFIDENTIAL I had very little difficulty, again using the same technique that Neil used. About half…
  • p. 236 …and then five successive spiral readings that Neil would log down as I would read them…
  • p. 241 …I guess it slipped my mind, perhaps Neil's too, that the Apollo 10 crew had…
  • p. 251 …It was a question of my looking at the LEC, talking to Neil, and hoping we…
# CONFIDENTIAL

for the PDI needs additional work prior to the next flight.

There are some alternative methods of understanding platform drift, which we just did not have time to implement. Perhaps the next flights will be able to look at some of these alternatives and decide on an even better method than the Sun check.

## ALDRIN

We turned the propellant quantity on before DOI and I believe the quantity light came on at that point, which was expected as a possibility. Just recycling the switch off and back on again would extinguish the light. The values that we saw in fuel were about 94 and 95, which is what we generally saw in the simulator. The oxidizer value was somewhat lower than that. The simulator values were 95 and 95. I don't believe that there was sufficient time during DOI for these to settle down completely. They did approach the maximum numbers with a reading of approximately 94. Anyway, they weren't dancing around the way we might have been led to expect them to do.

The pre-PDI attitude prevented good S-band high gain contact. We had continual communications difficulty in this area until we finally yawed the spacecraft right

## CONFIDENTIAL

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 251 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.