Documents / Report

AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office · 2024-03 · 63 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Department of Defense All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office issued Volume I of its Historical Record Report in February 2024. It reviews U.S. Government UAP investigations since 1945, drawing on classified and unclassified archives and about 30 interviews. AARO found no evidence that any sighting represented extraterrestrial technology and no empirical evidence of reverse-engineering programs, attributing such claims to misidentified sensitive programs, the unapproved KONA BLUE proposal and circular reporting. It also found an alleged crash sample to be an ordinary terrestrial alloy.

  • p. 2 …Accounts of USG UAP Investigatory Programs Since 1945 ............................................. 13 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 13 Project SAUCER (1946/1947–January…
  • p. 3 …Assessment of Interviewee Claims of USG Involvement in Hidden UAP Programs ......... 28 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 28 Primary Narrative…
  • p. 6 …In completing this report, AARO reviewed all official USG investigatory efforts since 1945, researched classified and…
  • p. 7 …Executive Summary AARO found no evidence that any USG investigation, academic-sponsored research, or official review…
  • p. 8 …the testing of extraterrestrial technology at a USG facility almost certainly was an observation of an…
  • p. 9 …AARO assesses that the inaccurate claim that the USG is reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology and is…
  • p. 10 10 • The aggregate findings of all USG investigations to date have not found even one case…
  • p. 11 …AARO interviewed approximately 30 people who claimed to have insight into alleged USG involvement in off…
  • p. 12 …These LOEs were to: • Conduct open-source research on claims (through historical interviews) about USG investigations…
  • p. 13 …Accounts of USG UAP Investigatory Programs Since 1945 Summary AARO reviewed official USG efforts involving UFOs…
  • p. 17 …They recommended the USG use various channels to debunk UFO reports and suggested monitoring domestic UFO…
  • p. 20 …scientific research in terms of academic or USG-sponsored research and in secondary schools. The panel…
  • p. 21 …Advisor Sandy Berger to determine if the USG held aliens or alien technology. President Clinton said…
  • p. 22 22 up” by the USG. Rather, the materials recovered near Roswell were consistent with a balloon…
  • p. 24 …national security; and (5) consistent consolidation of reports from across the USG, standardized reporting, increased collection…
  • p. 25 …Simons Foundation and included members from the USG, academia, and the private sector.74 Results: NASA…
  • p. 27 …Key Findings • None of these investigations (including USG, foreign, and U.S. academic efforts) reached the…
  • p. 28 …Assessment of Interviewee Claims of USG Involvement in Hidden UAP Programs Summary As of September 17…
  • p. 31 …possession of the resultant material by the USG and the private sector, and the attempt to…
  • p. 32 …off-world technology in possession of the USG, a private contractor, or any other foreign or…
  • p. 33 …Investigation into Named USG Sensitive Programs Summary AARO investigated numerous named, and described, but unnamed programs…
  • p. 34 …Findings One Private Program Mistaken for USG Program AARO determined that the following alleged USG program…
  • p. 35 …KONA BLUE’s advocates were convinced that the USG was hiding UAP technologies. They believed that…
  • p. 36 …It has determined that modern allegations that the USG is hiding off-world technology and beings…
  • p. 37 …Secrecy The USG’s need to maintain secrecy to protect classified information about intelligence sources and…
  • p. 38 …Perceived Deception There is a conviction among some Americans that the USG has conducted a deception…
  • p. 39 …population that the USG has not been truthful regarding knowledge of extraterrestrial craft.128 Popular Culture…
  • p. 41 …USAF took over the project in 1958 when Avro offered it to the USG, when it…
  • p. 43 …The USG acquired and operated a number of systems for a range of missions including intelligence…
19
AARO partnered with the U.S. National Archives to examine the records from the
USAF’s Project BLUE BOOK, which spanned from 1947 to 1969. This research presented a
significant challenge because of the volume of the documentation amounted to 7,252 files
holding a total of 65,778 digital records. The vast majority of the files are populated with USAF
documentation. Some cases contain media clippings and images, but these instances are rare.
Results: Project BLUE BOOK determined that:
• No UFO reported, investigated, and evaluated by the USAF demonstrated any
indication of a threat to national security.
• There was no evidence submitted to, or discovered by, the USAF that sightings
represented technological developments or principles beyond the range of then-
present day scientific knowledge.
• There was no evidence indicating that sightings categorized as unidentified are
“extraterrestrial vehicles.”
• Of the 12,618 sightings in Project BLUE BOOK’s holdings, 701 were categorized as
unidentified and never solved.3839
CIA Evaluation of UFOs (1964)
Background: Following high-level White House discussions on what to do if alien
intelligence was discovered or there was a new outbreak of UFO sightings, DCI John McCone
tasked the CIA to update its evaluation of UFOs. The CIA’s scientific division officially
acquired UFO-sighting case information from the director of the National Investigations
Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), a private organization founded in 1956. 40
Results: Donald F. Chamberlain, Assistant Director of OSI, subsequently informed
McCone that little had changed since the early 1950s; there was still no evidence that UFOs were
a threat to the security of the United States or that they were of “foreign origin.” 41
O’Brien Committee (1964)
Background: Dr. Brian O’Brien, a member of the USAF Scientific Advisory Board,
chaired the USAF Ad Hoc Review of Project BLUE BOOK. The committee included Carl
Sagan, a prominent astronomer from Cornell University.42
Results: The committee’s report stated that UFOs did not threaten U.S. national security
and that it could find no UFO case which represented technological or scientific advances
outside of a terrestrial framework. The committee’s primary recommendation was that this topic
merited intensive academic research and that a top university should lead the study.43
The Condon Report (April 1968)
Background: Dr. Edward U. Condon, a physicist and former Director of the National
Bureau of Standards, was the scientific director of an 18-month study on “flying saucers” funded
under a $325,000 USAF contract to the University of Colorado. This panel took a narrow and

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 63 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.